A rhetorical question I think. The short answer is the African elite, the longer answer is African people as undefined. As an aside, I looked over the EE Commission's report to see if a definition of African, Coloured or Indian exists and could find nothing, the best I could find was here, which asked the […]
Who stands to benefit from the revised BEE codes Read More »
A rather decent explanation of the constitutionality of racial quotas at national level. Implementing this kind of ruling is also entirely unconstitutional. It can, should and most likely will be challenged in the ConCourt if it is implemented. BEE is not exactly the same as quotas. Players are not "interviewed" as such; the interview process
Quota, un-quota: Mbalula’s ‘Constitution? What Constitution?’ moment Read More »
What does a ruling party do when they realise that their definition of black is not working for them? Simple, they use the economically active population (EAP) to create degrees of blackness. Perhaps the gestation of this thinking went along these lines. ANC/government person 1: Soooooooooooooo we’ve got the definition of black in the BEE
Black is black – I want my black back Read More »
It's not possible to think about the economically active population (EAP) without considering the ANC's institutional racist. I was not aware of the EAP until I caught jungle mouthing off about the oversupply of coloureds a few years ago. This EAP now allows the government to institutionalise the concept of degrees of blackness. It's not
Manyi crEAP and the new codes Read More »
